Skip to content

(PE-41731) Add pe-workflow database #605

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2025

Conversation

beechtom
Copy link
Contributor

@beechtom beechtom commented Jul 11, 2025

Summary

Adds the pe-workflow DB targeted for PE >=2025.6.0

Additional Context

Add any additional context about the problem here.

Related Issues (if any)

Mention any related issues or pull requests.

Checklist

  • 🟢 Spec tests.
  • 🟢 Acceptance tests.

Changes include test coverage?

  • Yes
  • Not needed

Have you updated the documentation?

  • Yes, I've updated the appropriate docs
  • Not needed

@beechtom beechtom requested review from a team as code owners July 11, 2025 15:28
Adds the pe-workflow DB targeted for PE >=2025.6.0
@beechtom beechtom force-pushed the PE-41731/workflow-service branch from 48602d3 to ebb7929 Compare July 11, 2025 15:44
@beechtom beechtom changed the title (PE-41731) Add workflow-service database (PE-41731) Add pe-workflow database Jul 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@davidmalloncares davidmalloncares left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, one of those tests just wouldn't pass but it is a particularly flaky one and I;m sick looking at it fail - it doesn't look to be anything to do with your change so I'm just going to merge this

@davidmalloncares davidmalloncares merged commit 6b7273d into main Jul 23, 2025
204 of 267 checks passed
@davidmalloncares davidmalloncares deleted the PE-41731/workflow-service branch July 23, 2025 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants